
Antiviral [2012] – ★★★★
In 2012, a science-fiction film titled Antiviral hit both the Cannes Film Festival and the Toronto Film Festival, and what everybody talked about was that this film is from David Cronenberg’s son – Brandon Cronenberg. People started to look for similarities between Antiviral and David Cronenberg’s films and trademarks, and they found plenty of those. One of the points of this review is that Antiviral is an impressive film debut from Brandon Cronenberg, irrespective of his link to his famous father. That film and that director should be recognised in their own right. Antiviral is not a perfect film, but it has many interesting ideas and a good execution. It also has a feel different from David Cronenberg’s filmography. In Antiviral, Syd March (Caleb Landry Jones) is an employee of Lucas Clinic, a place where the dream of obsessed fans to be closer to their celebrities may be realised by injecting them with a live virus from one of the sick big celebrities. This way, customers will experience a one-of-a-kind union with their idols. One such celebrity which has a link to the clinic is beautiful Hannah Geist (Sarah Gadon (Indignation)(2016)). When Hannah falls ill after a trip to China, Syd flouts company regulations and becomes a host to her virus, not even realising that Hannah is on the brink of death.
At the core of Antiviral is that deliciously-absurd and highly-imaginative idea of the celebrity-obsessed culture stretched to the limits.
Some may say that the premise in this film is ludicrous, but Cronenberg simply took today’s obsession with celebrities to a whole new level, and the result is rather thought-provoking. At Lucas Clinic, people are prepared to pay hefty sums of money to be injected with a virus taken from their idols, and, as clinic employees say – some form of that will live with them – inside their bodies – forever, even when they are well again. This way “to taste” their celebrities’ perfection and become intimate with them is unparalleled because not even partners to these celebrities get to reach that level of communion. The irony is, of course, that when celebrities are ill they are no longer “perfect”, and Cronenberg plays with that illusion of perfection and the absurdity of the situation. Quite logically, a tulip becomes Lucas Clinic’s symbol since the wondrous colours of tulips are notoriously caused by a virus, with the clinic making its point that something as beautiful and perfect as that can only be achieved through contacting a contagious disease. Cronenberg’s clear, “sterile” presentation of the clinic is intriguing, and the unflinching scenes of needles penetrating the skin of clients may just be rightly too uncomfortable to watch. The black-and-white-dominated cinematography provides then a nice contrast to the colour red when blood is introduced to the frame.
Caleb Landry Jones impresses as Syd, a detached “professional” merely doing his job when he calmly injects fans with diseases. The opening shot of him standing outside, near the Lucas Clinic advertisement banner, measuring his temperature, just about sums up the movie – this story is about one person who takes drastic risks with his health to possibly operate successfully outside the confines of the clinic. In the movie, we are not even sure of that intention, and because Syd’s true intentions in the story are so mysterious, this makes the film even more interesting. Jones plays his part just well enough for us to wonder whether there is more to his personality, and whether he may be just as obsessed with Hannah as any other client walking through the clinic doors.
Half-way through, it looks like the film hits the wall in terms of ideas, and loses its convincing force. The second half of the film does not feel as though it knows what it shows, and there is some chaotic and incoherent play with ideas and events. However, Cronenberg still manages to keep things interesting and there are some surprises to be found in the film’s second half. Understandably, Cronenberg throws into his movie some body-horror (see Dead Ringers (1988)), more blood (see Raw (2016)), and even Lynchian ideas, such as distinctive red drapes. He also tries to wrap his film up in some Kafkaesque indeterminacy and slow-burning enigma a la Upstream Colour (2013). The result is that the gory scenes look particularly impressive in the otherwise austere-looking presentation.
Antiviral proves that Brandon Cronenberg is a talented director and it is a pity that we have not seen him as a film director since 2012. The good news is that there is his film Possessor (2019) coming up, starring Sean Bean and Jennifer Jason Leigh, which may be something to keep an eye on. This is because Antiviral, with all its core incoherence, is still a movie where many elements worked well. The film’s minimalistic presentation, Jones’s impressive turn as “cool” Syd, and uncomfortable, dreamy scenes are all memorable. At the core of Antiviral is that deliciously-absurd and highly-imaginative idea of the celebrity-obsessed culture stretched to the limits, and the slightly unfocused, but committed direction is what brought this idea so compellingly to the screen.
Just read the plot synopsis on Wikipedia, that is some seriously disturbed stuff … but I can see that it’s not that much of a leap from here to there … we do live in interesting times.
LikeLike
Yes, rather disturbing. Cronenberg should really be applauded for bringing such a crazy idea to the screen and actually – actually – making it work (part of it anyway), because the plot does become strangely and eerily convincing in all its absurdity.
LikeLike
With Brandon, I guess the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree 🙂 Most of the running time the protagonist wanders around sick, which I agree is quite unsettling to watch. I gave the film a 6/10. I don’t think it needed to be 110 minutes but I liked the idea. Possessor (2019) is new to me, have added to my watchlist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The idea was good, wasn’t it? I agree about the length too. I guess I am a bit biased here because I especially like when my movies are dark and existentialist 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review. I’m a huge fan of David Cronenberg, but you’re absolutely right. This film proves that Brandon Cronenberg has his own distinctive voice. Antiviral is fantastic and highly original. I think it’s pretty underrated too. I had no idea he has a new film in the works, so that’s exciting news!
LikeLike
Thank you! I am glad to find someone else who thinks as I do. I imagine it is hard working in one father’s shadow and being compared to him. But, Antiviral is packed with so many interesting ideas and you can just see Brandon working through each scene to make it disturbing. He really made the movie his own, even if Cronenberg-inspired, and I also think he pulled much from the lead actor here. Definitely a solid debut.
LikeLike
Great post 🙂 Like you, I hope to see more of Brandon Cronenberg directing in the future. Antiviral may be flawed, but he seems like the guy, who would improve in the future. Anyway, keep up the great work as always 🙂
LikeLike
Thanks! Yes, Brandon has interesting ideas both as a director and scriptwriter and it is a shame therefore that he fell off the radar.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, I am curious to see this one now. Awesome synopsis by the way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! I hope you enjoy this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too!
LikeLiked by 1 person